|  |  | St Peter,
        Hockwold 
            
                |   |  | Hockwold
                merges into Wilton in this corner of the
                Brecklands. We are close to the Suffolk border
                here, and not so very far away from the
                Cambridgeshire border. We are also not so very
                far from the fen edge, so stone was a possibility
                in the late medieval period. They used to bring
                it by barge across the undrained fen from the
                quarries beyond Peterborough. But what would be
                the point? For we are at the centre of the
                medieval flint industry. Lakenheath
                railway station, on the Norwich to Cambridge
                line, sits just to the south of the village, but
                unfortunately it now only operates a
                'parliamentary service' of two trains a week.
                Wilton's church now serves both villages in the
                joint parish, and St Peter is in the care of the
                Churches Conservation Trust. It is open daily,
                although it wasn't on the occasion of my first
                visit, a day of heavy rain in the Autumn of 2009.
                I pottered about the dripping graveyard with its
                pleasing array of late 18th and 19th Century
                headstones, and knew I would have to come back
                soon.  Seven
                years passed, but in the hot summer of 2016 I
                came back to Hockwold. It was a day of rising
                heat, the precursor to the hottest days of the
                year which were to immediately follow. And this
                time, the church was open. At first sight, St
                Peter is slightly odd, because although this is a
                big late medieval church with a south aisle and a
                clerestory, the older tower is offset at the west
                end of the aisle. This, then, was the site of the
                original church.  |  But there
        is more to it than this, for, as Pevsner notes, there was
        a bequest as late as 1533 for 'hallowing' the church.
        This date seems to fit the wonderful angel roof, which is
        spectacularly late - another 14 years, and such imagery
        would be quite illegal. Is it coincidence that the angels
        are already morphing into more secular figures?     
       
      
 There is
        no north aisle or clerestory, but the great windows of
        the north side fill the church with light. Above the
        north door is a patchwork of late-medieval painted
        patternwork. 
            
                | Stepping
                into the chancel, the east window is filled with
                Clayton & Bell's glass depicting the
                Crucifixion, flanked by the Resurrection and the
                Ascension. Below, Christ enters Jerusalem, prays
                at Gethsemane and carries his cross. Well, I
                don't know. Does it really enhance this place? I
                don't think I've ever seen a Clayton & Bell
                window to set the pulses racing, have you? In
                their early days they could be good -
                witness the excellent work at East Winch, not so
                very far from here. But you feel that sometimes a
                spiritual space cries out for more than a mere
                safe pair of hands. And I am
                afraid that both Pevsner and Mortlock moaned
                about the memorials that flank it. To the right,
                sober and serious busts of 1719 to John and Maria
                Hungerford sit awkwardly, shouldering for space
                in the frame. There are musical instruments above
                them. To the left, an unconvincing cherub for
                Cyril Wyche of 1780 holding a wreath, having
                leant his upturned torch against the wall. Me, I
                can take or leave 18th Century memorials, but
                they matter to Pevsner and Mortlock.
                Both try to be kind. Neither of the monuments
                has the mark of quality, though they do try, argues
                Mortlock. Badly carved, which is unlike
                Singleton (the carver) says Pevsner.
                Mortlock decides that Cyril Wyche's cherub is sadly
                overweight. Oh
                dear! Best turn back to the nave, and that
                utterly wonderful roof. |  |   |  |  |  |